Read time: 3 minutes. Training to Failure vs. Not to Failure: How It Affects Recovery in Resistance TrainingA long-standing debate in strength training is whether training to failure is necessary for optimal gains. Moreover, does training for failure come at the expense of recovery? Understanding recovery dynamics is crucial for strength coaches who design programs with frequent training sessions or competitions. This study examines how different resistance training protocols (to failure vs. not to failure) affect recovery over 72 hours. How does training to failure vs. stopping short of failure impact short-term recovery in terms of neuromuscular performance and biochemical markers?Study: Time course of recovery following resistance training leading or not to failureโ What did the researchers do?Study Protocol10 highly trained male athletes completed three different resistance training sessions, all using bench press (BP) and full squat (SQ) at 75% of 1RM:
Measurements
What were the results?Neuromuscular Performance
Biochemical Markers
What does this mean?
Limitations
Coach's Takeaway
I hope this was helpful. Ramsey
Our Coach's AgreementI'll keep writing research breakdowns like this one, and if you find them valuable, share them with someone. Deal? Deal. When you're ready, I have a couple of ways I can help you grow: 1) Want to increase your coaching knowledge, confidence, career, and impact? โCheck out the Applied Performance Coach Course and Certificationโ 2) Want to learn more about jump analysis with force plates and force plates in general? โConsider the on-demand Jumping with Force Plates Courseโ 3) Want to join a network for coaches worldwide and have a hub for online performance education, connection, and growth? โJoin the Performance Academy Waitlist โโ If you want to get social, give me a follow on Twitter and Instagram by clicking the links below. |
Every Tuesday and Thursday, you'll get a study review to improve your knowledge, programming and coaching in less than 5 minutes
Read time: 3 minutes. Resisted vs. Unresisted Sprint Training: What Works Best? Sprinting is crucial in rugby, impacting speed, acceleration, and momentum in contact situations. Resisted Sprint Training (RST) and Unresisted Sprint Training (UST) are both used in speed development. But which is more effective? This study compared UST vs. RST (50% body mass) in youth rugby players over a 4-week period. Is unresisted or heavy sled resisted sprint training best for improving sprint performance...
Read time: 3 minutes. How Sprint Volume Impacts Performance and Fatigue: Key Takeaways for Coaches Repeated sprint training (RST) is a key method for improving speed, aerobic fitness, and intermittent running performance in team sports. However, the optimal session volume for balancing performance improvements and fatigue is not well understood. This study investigates how different sprint volumes (distance ร reps per session) impact physiological, neuromuscular, perceptual, and performance...
Read time: 3 minutes. Tomorrow, I am releasing CMJ Foundations, a new short course that breaks down the countermovement jump phases in 25 minutes. I'll email you a link tomorrow for you to check it out. If you are using force plates then this is a no-brainer. and oh yea, its only going to cost $1. Does Foam Rolling Improve Hamstring Contractility and Flexibility Post-Training? Foam rolling is a staple in recovery routines for athletes, strength coaches, and therapists. Itโs marketed as a tool...